COVID-19: At REI, we encourage you to get outside responsibly. Stay local, avoid recreational travel, practice social distancing and check ahead for area and facility closures. Learn More
MTB Project Logo

Forest Service Land Use Changes

Original Post
Lance Andrew · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Sep 2018 · Points: 0

Federal Lands which have historically been used by bikers and open to mountain biking are being closed to mountain biking, without balance analysis and public comment.  The Sawtooths in Idaho, the Bitterroots in Montana.    Provide public comment by Nov 18th to help voice your support for keeping historical mountain bike uses open in some of these ranges.

Post objections by email by including the following comment and content:

To: <>
Subject: Bitterroot Travel Plan Objection


[Objector Name]
[Objector Address]
[Objector City, State, Zip]
[Objector Phone]
 Objection To:
Bitterroot National Forest – Travel Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (hereinafter “Bitterroot Travel Plan”)

Description of Objections:
– Objections addressed specifically to:  pages 24-25 of the Bitterroot Travel Plan
The objector believes the Bitterroot Plan is objectionable because

    • The Bitterroot Plan restricts mountain biking in the areas known as the Sapphire and Blue Joint Wilderness Study Areas (“WSAs”)  which were used over an extended period of years for mountain biking before the areas were ever considered for designation as WSA.    The ROD finding that “mountain biking was not likely occurring in either the Sapphire or Blue Joint WSAs in 1977” is not correct.
    • The ROD finding that mountain biking is not compatible with “social and ecological characteristics to preserve wilderness character” cannot be justified on objective criteria; whether environmental, natural or social impact.  The USFS is not empowered to impose their subjective values into a land management process
    • The ROD cites that a consideration of wilderness character must consider “the opportunities for solitude it offered”.  Anecdotal data from user groups indicates that usage of the Sapphire or Blue Joint WSAs is of a manageable nature such that users have ample opportunities to use the areas in relative solitude.   The Forest Service has zero user counts for mountain biking in the Sapphire or Blue Joint WSAs and therefore cannot draw objective conclusions.
The objector believes his objection could be resolved by amending the Bitterroot Plan and the ROD to allow mountain-biking in the Sapphire and Blue Joint WSAs to maintain historical usage patterns.
Objector’s signature
David Johnson · · Unknown Hometown · Joined 10 days ago · Points: 0

On the official site. These new authorities help us face land management challenges by accelerating and broadening management efforts to work across boundaries” said Chief Vicki Christiansen. “These regulatory reforms represent a small part of the wealth of tools and authorities granted to us by the 2018 Farm Bill and the 2018 Consolidated Appropriations Act but will undoubtedly help us in our mission to improve the value and benefits of national forests and find a great review about some forest service. Hope you will find some more information about it.

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Other Stuff
Post a Reply to "Forest Service Land Use Changes "

Log In to Reply